Oh what the heck :)

If Perry's record IS removed who gets the record now? Crupi's and Perry's fish have one thing in common... no physical evidence. No fish, no photograph. (which brings up the real question... which witness is more likely to lie about the size of a fish... the post office employee or the lake marina employee) Whoever gets the record better have rock solid documentation (this is what this is all about right?). I guess Mike Arujo is next in line. I don't know much about that fish, but either way the giant can of worms opened up by choosing a new record holder would be much, much worse than this alleged hoax debate.

Perry's fish isn't perfect, possibly even false, but it's better than the alternatives.